In large, matrixed organizations, innovation projects often appear simple on the surface while carrying hidden operational risk beneath. This was the case for a new product initiative at a national food manufacturer, where an effort positioned as a fast moving line extension accumulated constraints that threatened to derail an entire launch year. MustardSeed was engaged, midway through the project, to surface execution risk and provide the structure and decision clarity needed to preserve the launch.
The project was designed to leverage existing formulations to quickly enter a growing snacking category. Early assumptions framed the work as low complexity and operationally straightforward.
As execution progressed, that assumption began to break down. Within weeks of engagement, MustardSeed identified multiple compounding risks that fundamentally undermined the original launch plan.
Equipment lead times eliminated the original launch date
A specialized piece of manufacturing equipment required for the intended product cut carried an extended lead time. Rental or alternative sourcing options were explored but ultimately ruled out. This single constraint invalidated the planned launch date, yet had not been escalated as a decision level risk.
Risk was known but not escalated
Timeline and feasibility concerns had been raised within functional teams, but escalation to leadership was inconsistent. Risks were viewed optimistically rather than analytically, delaying mitigation and reinforcing a false sense of control.
Execution complexity was underestimated
While recipes were reused, the combination of new equipment, new product cuts, and new packaging materials significantly increased execution complexity. No dedicated project management had been assigned at project start, leading to increased internal effort, blurred ownership, and delayed recognition of downstream impact.
Without intervention, these risks would likely have remained unresolved long enough to push the initiative entirely out of the 2026 launch window.
MustardSeed embedded a project leader to establish structure, validate feasibility, and convert scattered concerns into clear, actionable decisions.
1. Surfacing real constraints across functions
Targeted one-on-one discussions were conducted with Operations, R&D, Packaging, and Commercial leaders to surface concerns, confirm true schedule drivers, and document and highlight risks rather than minimize them.
2. Building an integrated master schedule
Within two weeks, MustardSeed developed a realistic, integrated master schedule aligned across functions. The schedule clearly demonstrated that the Spring target was no longer feasible, providing leadership with objective evidence rather than opinion.
3. Challenging delay before it cost the entire year
When a “wait and see” approach was proposed around confirming equipment lead times, MustardSeed intervened immediately. Waiting for final confirmation would have consumed additional weeks with no upside and increased the risk of losing the launch year.
4. Presenting leadership with real options
An alternative execution scenario centered on a different product cut was developed within two business days. Assumptions, tradeoffs, and residual risks were explicitly documented so leadership could evaluate options rather than debate symptoms.
5. Escalating early with cross-functional alignment
Risks and scenarios were escalated through formal governance forums with alignment from Sales, Operations, Brand, and R&D. Leadership received a single, coherent narrative supported by data, enabling an informed pivot.
Through early escalation and disciplined decision making, leadership was able to pivot the execution approach in time to protect a viable launch path within the same calendar year.
While the original Spring date was no longer achievable, proactive project leadership prevented the loss of the entire launch window and avoided late stage disruption that would have compounded cost and complexity.
This engagement reinforces a critical truth for complex innovation environments. Projects rarely fail because teams are not working hard; they fail because risks surface too late, ownership is diffuse, and decisions are delayed until options disappear.
In this case, disciplined project leadership delivered:
Project management was not overhead. It was the mechanism that converted complexity into control and protected a high value business outcome.
Client Confidentiality
We respect the privacy of the organizations that trust us to embed within their teams. For that reason, we do not publicly disclose client names or partner names in our case studies. If you would like to verify our impact and speak directly with a reference, we are happy to facilitate introductions.
Subscribe for insights and updates.
